<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Nick C&#039;s Behind the Screens</title>
	<atom:link href="http://behindthescreensblog.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://behindthescreensblog.com</link>
	<description>&#34;Cinema is a matter of what&#039;s in the frame and what&#039;s out. &#34; - Martin Scorcese</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 20:16:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Has ABC canceled Scrubs?</title>
		<link>http://behindthescreensblog.com/2010/03/11/has-abc-canceled-scrubs/</link>
		<comments>http://behindthescreensblog.com/2010/03/11/has-abc-canceled-scrubs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 20:16:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric S</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ABC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric S]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scrubs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://behindthescreensblog.com/?p=887</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some hopeful fans are calling the two Wednesday episodes of Scrubs a &#8220;Comedy Wednesday&#8221; tryout, a more likely scenario is that these episodes are merely being burned off.   Now, ABC.com is calling next week&#8217;s episode the &#8220;Series Finale.&#8221;

It is entirely possible this was a typo, though given its performance the past two seasons, I think [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some hopeful fans are calling the two Wednesday episodes of <em>Scrubs</em> a &#8220;Comedy Wednesday&#8221; tryout, a more likely scenario is that these episodes are merely being burned off.   Now, ABC.com is calling next week&#8217;s episode the &#8220;Series Finale.&#8221;</p>
<p><span id="more-887"></span></p>
<p>It is entirely possible this was a typo, though given its performance the past two seasons, I think that is unlikely.  Last night, it pulled in 4.3 million viewers and a 1.5 demo.  For persepective,  last week a repeat of <em>Modern Family</em> pulled 5.1 million and a 1.7 demo.   To rub salt in that wound, the final episode of <em>Hank</em> which aired on 11/4/09 managed 5.3 million and a 1.4 demo.  Yes, one million more viewers (to be fair, fewer in the demo) cared to watch <em>Hank</em>.  Given all of this perspective, I would say it&#8217;s a safe bet that <em>Scrubs </em>on Wednesdays is a burnoff, not a tryout.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://behindthescreensblog.com/2010/03/11/has-abc-canceled-scrubs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>8 is Enough for 24</title>
		<link>http://behindthescreensblog.com/2010/03/10/8-is-enough-for-24/</link>
		<comments>http://behindthescreensblog.com/2010/03/10/8-is-enough-for-24/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 06:11:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric S</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Eric S]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FOX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[24]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://behindthescreensblog.com/?p=884</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[24 is three things: Expensive, Aging, and trending downward in the ratings.  So it should come as a surprise to no one that Fox is about to let the clock run out.
Enough of the clock wordplay, however, it&#8217;s time to get serious.  Fox and 24 star Keifer Sutherland have been saying publicly for quite some [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>24</em> is three things: Expensive, Aging, and trending downward in the ratings.  So it should come as a surprise to no one that Fox is about to let the clock run out.</p>
<p><span id="more-884"></span>Enough of the clock wordplay, however, it&#8217;s time to get serious.  Fox and <em>24</em> star Keifer Sutherland have been saying publicly for quite some time that the ultimate goal is for the show to transition from a television show to the big screen.  In order for that to happen the show would have to end, it takes a long time to produce this show and logistically it would be difficult to shoot a feature movie around it.  So long as ratings are high, the television show must go on!  However, ratings aren&#8217;t so high anymore.   Last night&#8217;s episode pulled in a respectable 8.8 million viewers and a 2.8 in the 18-49 demo.   One year earlier (3/9/09) the show clocked in with 11.3 million and a 3.6 in the demo.  Clearly, this season&#8217;s ratings are less respectable when you see the dip they have taken.</p>
<p>20th Century will reportedly try to shop the show around to other potential outlets, but given the high price tag and dwindling ratings, that seems unlikely.  If they are serious about turning <em>24</em> into a movie, potentially a series of them, it would seem they would want to keep the brand as strong as possible &#8211; in other words, why tarnish it by transition to NBC for a 9th season of even weaker ratings?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://behindthescreensblog.com/2010/03/10/8-is-enough-for-24/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Undercover Boss renewed</title>
		<link>http://behindthescreensblog.com/2010/03/09/undercover-boss-renewed/</link>
		<comments>http://behindthescreensblog.com/2010/03/09/undercover-boss-renewed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 20:05:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric S</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CBS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric S]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Undercover Boss]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://behindthescreensblog.com/?p=878</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CBS announced today it is ordering a second season of Undercover Boss in what is likely the least-surprising news of the season.   No official mention of how many episodes or how they will manage to slide CEOs into their own companies without being noticed this time around.

Here is the press release from CBS:
UNDERCOVER BOSS, which [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CBS announced today it is ordering a second season of <em>Undercover Boss</em> in what is likely the least-surprising news of the season.   No official mention of how many episodes or how they will manage to slide CEOs into their own companies without being noticed this time around.</p>
<p><span id="more-878"></span></p>
<p>Here is the press release from CBS:</p>
<p>UNDERCOVER BOSS, which follows high-level chief executives as they slip anonymously into the rank and file of their companies, is the number one new series of the 2009-2010 season, averaging 18.74 million viewers, 8.0/17 in adults 25-54 and 7.1/17 in adults 18-49.</p>
<p>The series premiered following the Super Bowl to 38.7 million viewers, the largest audience for a new series following the Super Bowl. It also ranks as the biggest new series premiere since 1987 and the most-watched premiere episode of any reality series.</p>
<p>“We are thrilled with the overwhelming response to the series and how audiences seem to connect to it on several levels,” said Jennifer Bresnan, Senior Vice President, CBS Alternative Programming. “The wish fulfillment of seeing the top boss perform jobs of the rank and file is universal, and the employees’ stories discovered at each company are often relatable and inspirational.”</p>
<p>Each week, UNDERCOVER BOSS follows a different executive as they leave the comfort of their corner office for an undercover mission to examine the inner workings of their companies. While working alongside their employees, they see the effects their decisions have on others, where the problems lie within their organizations and get an up-close look at both the good and the bad while discovering the unsung heroes who make their companies run.</p>
<p>Stephen Lambert and Eli Holzman are executive producers for Studio Lambert, Ltd.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://behindthescreensblog.com/2010/03/09/undercover-boss-renewed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fox announces summer schedule</title>
		<link>http://behindthescreensblog.com/2010/03/09/fox-announces-summer-schedule/</link>
		<comments>http://behindthescreensblog.com/2010/03/09/fox-announces-summer-schedule/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 20:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric S</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Eric S]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FOX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LIE TO ME]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PAST LIFE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sons of Tucson]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://behindthescreensblog.com/?p=875</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lie To Me finally returns to finish season 2, but is it a burn-off?  Normally, it seems that when a show is picked off the lineup after a fall run and then banished to the summer doldrums, it would appear that way.  In this case, however, I think it has more to do with Fox [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Lie To Me</em> finally returns to finish season 2, but is it a burn-off?  Normally, it seems that when a show is picked off the lineup after a fall run and then banished to the summer doldrums, it would appear that way.  In this case, however, I think it has more to do with Fox having too many shows and too little real estate.  If they wanted to burn it off, they would shove it on Fridays.  I think they ultimately chose <em>Fringe</em> over <em>Lie to Me</em> for the fall lineup and are testing <em>Lie to Me</em> to see if there is some life in it when it&#8217;s plopped in the lineup to fend for itself in June.   To the contrary, <em>Past Life</em> is nothing more than a burn-off, as it will be running its remaining episodes on Fridays, beginning with a two hour event that will kill off remaining episodes even faster (think: Dollhouse last December.)</p>
<p>Here is the rest of Fox&#8217;s summer line-up, as announced by the network today.</p>
<p><span id="more-875"></span></p>
<p>Monday (starting June 7)</p>
<p>8:00 &#8211; Lie to Me<br />
9:00 &#8211; <strong>The Good Guys </strong></p>
<p>Tuesday (starting June 1)</p>
<p>8:00 &#8211; So You Think You Can Dance<br />
9:00 &#8211; Glee (season finale June 8, SYTYCD extends to two hours June 15)</p>
<p>Wednesday (starting June 16)</p>
<p>8:00 &#8211; Glee (repeats)<br />
9:00 &#8211; So You Think You Can Dance</p>
<p>Thursday (starting May 27)</p>
<p>8:00 &#8211; So You Think You Can Dance</p>
<p>Thursdays (starting June 10)</p>
<p>8:00 &#8211; Hell&#8217;s Kitchen</p>
<p>Friday (starting May 28)</p>
<p>8:00 &#8211; Past Life<br />
9:00 &#8211; House (encores; beginning June 4)</p>
<p>Friday (starting June 18)</p>
<p>8:00 &#8211; Bones (encores)<br />
9:00 &#8211; House (encores)</p>
<p>Saturday</p>
<p>8:00 &#8211; Cops<br />
8:30 &#8211; Cops<br />
9:00 &#8211; America&#8217;s Most Wanted<br />
11:00 &#8211; The Wanda Sykes Show<br />
12:00 &#8211; Animation Domination (encores)</p>
<p>Sunday (starting June 6)</p>
<p>7:00 &#8211; 9:30 Animation Domination (Mix of <em>Simpsons</em>,<em> Family Guy</em>,<em> American Dad</em>, <em>Cleveland Show</em>, and not-so-animated<em> &#8216;Til Death</em>)<br />
9:30 &#8211; <strong>Sons of Tucson</strong></p>
<span class="sfforumlink"><a href="http://behindthescreensblog.com/forums/articles/fox-announces-summer-schedule/"><img src="http://behindthescreensblog.com/wp-content/plugins/simple-forum/styles/icons/default/bloglink.png" alt="" /> Join the forum discussion on this post</a> - (1) Posts</span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://behindthescreensblog.com/2010/03/09/fox-announces-summer-schedule/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fringe renewed</title>
		<link>http://behindthescreensblog.com/2010/03/09/fringe-renewed/</link>
		<comments>http://behindthescreensblog.com/2010/03/09/fringe-renewed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 19:44:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric S</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Eric S]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FOX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FRINGE]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://behindthescreensblog.com/?p=872</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fringe fans can breathe a sigh of relief, for now, as Fox has picked the show up for a full 22 episode 3rd season.

You may recall that after Fringe faltered a bit in the ratings after moving this fall to Thursdays at 9 opposite powerhouses CSI, Grey&#8217;s Anatomy, and The Office.  DVR numbers were still [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Fringe</em> fans can breathe a sigh of relief, for now, as Fox has picked the show up for a full 22 episode 3rd season.</p>
<p><span id="more-872"></span></p>
<p>You may recall that after <em>Fringe</em> faltered a bit in the ratings after moving this fall to Thursdays at 9 opposite powerhouses <em>CSI</em>, <em>Grey&#8217;s Anatomy</em>, and <em>The Office</em>.  DVR numbers were still good, and when the competition was in repeats,<em> Fringe</em> showed some signs of life.  While ratings are still nowhere near what they were last season in its post-<em>House</em> and <em>Idol</em> slots, Fox does see a chance to gain a foothold on a night where it has long struggled as both <em>CSI</em> and <em>Grey&#8217;s</em> are agin shows with declining ratings.  Hopefully viewers check out what is left of season 2, as creatively it is definitely on an upswing.  Who else is excited for some more William Bell?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://behindthescreensblog.com/2010/03/09/fringe-renewed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Past Life canceled.  Yawn.</title>
		<link>http://behindthescreensblog.com/2010/02/19/past-life-canceled-yawn/</link>
		<comments>http://behindthescreensblog.com/2010/02/19/past-life-canceled-yawn/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 20:02:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric S</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Eric S]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FOX]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://behindthescreensblog.com/?p=870</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fox, which was burning off Past Life during Fringe&#8217;s winter hiatus and opposite the olympics, decided three episodes (including one in the plum post-Idol) slot was enough.

After squandering its lead-in (a Bones repeat) for the past two weeks and thus dragging down Fox&#8217;s Thursday averages, the network has pulled the show off its lineup effective [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fox, which was burning off <em>Past Life</em> during Fringe&#8217;s winter hiatus and opposite the olympics, decided three episodes (including one in the plum post-<em>Idol</em>) slot was enough.</p>
<p><span id="more-870"></span></p>
<p>After squandering its lead-in (a <em>Bones</em> repeat) for the past two weeks and thus dragging down Fox&#8217;s Thursday averages, the network has pulled the show off its lineup effective immediately.   The network plans to finishing burning off the burn-off at a later date (ouch!  Even <em>&#8216;Til Death</em> is getting the Sunday at 7 treatment!)  This hardly comes as a surprise though, given its poor performance last night:  Overnight numbers project 3.49 million viewers and a 1.1 in the 18-49 demo.  At least ABC&#8217;s burn-off <em>The Deep End</em> managed to break 4 million to go with that 1.1 demo!  (Admission: I kind of like <em>The Deep End</em>, but that&#8217;s something for another time.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://behindthescreensblog.com/2010/02/19/past-life-canceled-yawn/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CW hands out early renewals; none of them Unexpected</title>
		<link>http://behindthescreensblog.com/2010/02/16/cw-hands-out-early-renewals-none-of-them-unexpected/</link>
		<comments>http://behindthescreensblog.com/2010/02/16/cw-hands-out-early-renewals-none-of-them-unexpected/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 18:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric S</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Dawn Ostroff Is A Twit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric S]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MELROSE PLACE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[One Tree Hill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SMALLVILLE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SUPERNATURAL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The CW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VAMPIRE DIARIES]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[90210]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America's Next Top Model]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gossip Girl]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://behindthescreensblog.com/?p=868</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The CW joined the early renewal bandwagon today by announcing the green-lights for its top-rated (by their standards) series.
90210, America&#8217;s Next Top Model, Gossip Girl, Supernatural, and Vampire Diaries will all be back next fall, meanwhile the fates of One Tree Hill, Smallville, Life Unexpected, and Melrose Place are less clear.  Smallville and One Tree [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The CW joined the early renewal bandwagon today by announcing the green-lights for its top-rated (by their standards) series.</p>
<p><span id="more-868"></span><em>90210</em>, <em>America&#8217;s Next Top Model</em>, <em>Gossip Girl</em>, <em>Supernatural</em>, and <em>Vampire Diaries</em> will all be back next fall, meanwhile the fates of <em>One Tree Hill</em>, <em>Smallville</em>, <em>Life Unexpected</em>, and <em>Melrose Place</em> are less clear.  <em>Smallville</em> and <em>One Tree Hill </em>probably comes down to contracts, whereas<em> Life Unexpected </em>could really go either way.  Ratings were decent out the gate but have dipped, granted reruns on Wednesdays are performing well given its a CW rerun.  This show is still very much on the bubble, with the network likely waiting out a few more weeks of ratings data.  As for <em>Melrose Place</em>, it&#8217;s far superior to <em>90210</em>, but not even Heather Locklear could save this one from ratings doom.   Barring a miraculous uptick in the ratings that show it keeping full retention out of <em>90210</em>, it has no chance at a renewal.  Here&#8217;s the full text from the CW press release about the other shows:</p>
<p>THE CW ANNOUNCES EARLY PICKUPS FOR FIVE SERIES</p>
<p>Freshman Hit &#8220;The Vampire Diaries,&#8221; &#8220;Gossip Girl,&#8221; &#8220;90210,&#8221; &#8220;Supernatural&#8221; and &#8220;America&#8217;s Next Top Model&#8221; To Return Next Season</p>
<p>February 16, 2010 (Burbank, California) &#8211; The CW Network has given early pickups to five series for next season, including four signature dramas and the reality hit AMERICA&#8217;S NEXT TOP MODEL. All five shows will return in Fall 2010.</p>
<p>The series receiving early renewals include this season&#8217;s breakout hit THE VAMPIRE DIARIES, The CW&#8217;s most-watched show (4.6 million viewers) and the network&#8217;s number one show among adults 18-34 (2.5/8). THE VAMPIRE DIARIES premiere generated the largest audience in network history for a series debut (5.7 million total viewers). THE VAMPIRE DIARIES has improved The CW&#8217;s performance Thursday at 8:00 p.m. by 114% among women 18-34 this season. The network also renewed fan favorite SUPERNATURAL, which will enter its sixth season next year. SUPERNATURAL has one of the most loyal audiences of any show on television and does heroic work in a perennially tough time period. It has improved over last season among women and adults 18-34 (29% and 8%, respectively) this season, a remarkable accomplishment for a fifth-year show.</p>
<p>Also given early pickups for next season are The CW&#8217;s Monday night sensation GOSSIP GIRL, which is The CW&#8217;s number one show among its target demographic of women 18-34, and Tuesday&#8217;s trend-setting drama, 90210, which sees some of TV&#8217;s largest percent increases from DVR playback, nearly doubling its women 18-34 live-only ratings once live+7 data is included. Wednesday anchor AMERICA&#8217;S NEXT TOP MODEL will also be back for cycles 15 and 16 with superstar Tyra Banks and new groups of aspiring models. TOP MODEL continues to rank second in the competitive Wednesday 8:00 p.m. hour among young women 18-34 (3.4/10).</p>
<span class="sfforumlink"><a href="http://behindthescreensblog.com/forums/articles/cw-hands-out-early-renewals-none-of-them-unexpected/"><img src="http://behindthescreensblog.com/wp-content/plugins/simple-forum/styles/icons/default/bloglink.png" alt="" /> Join the forum discussion on this post</a> - (1) Posts</span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://behindthescreensblog.com/2010/02/16/cw-hands-out-early-renewals-none-of-them-unexpected/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NBC&#8217;s Leno-less primetime schedule</title>
		<link>http://behindthescreensblog.com/2010/01/14/nbcs-leno-less-primetime-schedule/</link>
		<comments>http://behindthescreensblog.com/2010/01/14/nbcs-leno-less-primetime-schedule/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 22:28:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric S</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CHUCK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric S]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NBC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://behindthescreensblog.com/?p=865</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NBC has unveiled it&#8217;s new primetime lineup that will premiere after the Olympics.   Now, instead of having &#8220;The Jay Leno Show&#8221; in primetime, NBC can be ignored with more &#8220;Trauma&#8221; in primetime.   Here&#8217;s the full schedule as most television viewers won&#8217;t even see it come March.

Monday
8 &#8211; Chuck
9 &#8211; Trauma (March 
10 &#8211; Law &#38; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NBC has unveiled it&#8217;s new primetime lineup that will premiere after the Olympics.   Now, instead of having &#8220;The Jay Leno Show&#8221; in primetime, NBC can be ignored with more &#8220;Trauma&#8221; in primetime.   Here&#8217;s the full schedule as most television viewers won&#8217;t even see it come March.</p>
<p><span id="more-865"></span></p>
<p>Monday</p>
<p>8 &#8211; Chuck<br />
9 &#8211; Trauma (March <img src='http://behindthescreensblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_cool.gif' alt='8)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
10 &#8211; Law &amp; Order (March 1 with two hour episode at 9)</p>
<p>Tuesday</p>
<p>8 &#8211; The Biggest Loser<br />
10 -<strong> Parenthood</strong> (March 2)</p>
<p>Wednesday</p>
<p>8 &#8211; Mercy<br />
9 &#8211; Law &amp; Order: SVU (encores; March 3)<br />
10 &#8211; Law &amp; Order: SVU (new episodes; March 3)</p>
<p>Thursday</p>
<p>8 &#8211; Community<br />
8:30 &#8211; Parks &amp; Recreation<br />
9 &#8211; The Office<br />
9:30 &#8211; 30 Rock<br />
10:00 &#8211; <strong>The Marriage Ref </strong>(March 4, premieres Sunday 2/28)</p>
<p>Friday</p>
<p>8 &#8211; <strong>Who Do You Think You Are?</strong> (March 5); Friday Night Lights (April 30)<br />
9 &#8211; Dateline NBC (March 5)</p>
<p>Saturday</p>
<p>8 &#8211; The Biggest Loser (encores)<br />
9 &#8211; Law &amp; Order (encores)<br />
10 &#8211; Law &amp; Order: SVU (encores)</p>
<p>Sunday</p>
<p>7 &#8211; Dateline NBC<br />
8 &#8211; <strong>Minute to Win It</strong> (March 14)<br />
9 &#8211; Celebrity Apprentice (March 14)</p>
<p>Thoughts: Well, at least they didn&#8217;t rename &#8220;The Biggest Loser&#8221;  &#8220;The Biggest Loser: TBL.&#8221;  Given the sad state the network is in, this is probably the best they could do.  Pretty pathetic that instead of developing new hit shows to replace &#8220;Friends&#8221; and &#8220;Seinfeld&#8221; we&#8217;re not left with reality shows from Jerry Seinfeld (&#8221;Marriage Ref&#8221;) and Lisa Kudrow (&#8221;Who Do You Think You Are?&#8221;)  I&#8217;m glad to see &#8220;Parenthood&#8221; is being propped up by &#8220;The Biggest Loser,&#8221; I&#8217;ve been looking forward to it.   Good news for &#8220;Chuck,&#8221; after encouraging ratings for the first couple of episodes, and given the sorry state of the network, it would seem a shoo-in for next fall at this point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://behindthescreensblog.com/2010/01/14/nbcs-leno-less-primetime-schedule/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conan to NBC: Pluck You</title>
		<link>http://behindthescreensblog.com/2010/01/12/conan-to-nbc-pluck-you/</link>
		<comments>http://behindthescreensblog.com/2010/01/12/conan-to-nbc-pluck-you/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 20:51:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric S</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Eric S]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leno]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://behindthescreensblog.com/?p=862</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Conan O&#8217;Brien has finally come forward with his intentions: He won&#8217;t be following Jay Leno anymore.  And who could blame him?

Following last week&#8217;s announcement that NBC would be abandoning its catastrophic decision to strip &#8220;The Jay Leno Show&#8221; in primetime after only a few months due to overwhelming pressure from its affiliates and the subsequent [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Conan O&#8217;Brien has finally come forward with his intentions: He won&#8217;t be following Jay Leno anymore.  And who could blame him?</p>
<p><span id="more-862"></span></p>
<p>Following last week&#8217;s announcement that NBC would be abandoning its catastrophic decision to strip &#8220;The Jay Leno Show&#8221; in primetime after only a few months due to overwhelming pressure from its affiliates and the subsequent decision to move Leno back to 11:35, the big question mark has been what will Conan O&#8217;Brien do?  NBC seemed to make it clear that they wanted to move &#8220;The Tonight Show w/ Conan O&#8217;Brien&#8221; to 12:05, following Leno&#8217;s half hour show which would now air at 11:35.  Whether that is true or a load of peacock crap, we may never know.  Perhaps NBC did want this overcrowded late night menu.  Or, more likely, they wanted to push Conan aside and put Leno back in place on &#8220;The Tonight Show.&#8221;  Either way, the whole thing stinks.  As a fan of Conan, Jay, and Dave, I just think the whole thing stinks and it was yet another lose-lose situation created by the wrath of Jeff Zucker</p>
<p>Here is the official statement released from Conan O&#8217;Brien:</p>
<blockquote><p>People of Earth:</p>
<p>In the last few days, I’ve been getting a lot of sympathy calls, and I want to start by making it clear that no one should waste a second feeling sorry for me. For 17 years, I’ve been getting paid to do what I love most and, in a world with real problems, I’ve been absurdly lucky. That said, I’ve been suddenly put in a very public predicament and my bosses are demanding an immediate decision.</p>
<p>Six years ago, I signed a contract with NBC to take over The Tonight Show in June of 2009. Like a lot of us, I grew up watching Johnny Carson every night and the chance to one day sit in that chair has meant everything to me. I worked long and hard to get that opportunity, passed up far more lucrative offers, and since 2004 I have spent literally hundreds of hours thinking of ways to extend the franchise long into the future. It was my mistaken belief that, like my predecessor, I would have the benefit of some time and, just as important, some degree of ratings support from the prime-time schedule. Building a lasting audience at 11:30 is impossible without both.</p>
<p>But sadly, we were never given that chance. After only seven months, with my Tonight Show in its infancy, NBC has decided to react to their terrible difficulties in prime-time by making a change in their long-established late night schedule.</p>
<p>Last Thursday, NBC executives told me they intended to move the Tonight Show to 12:05 to accommodate the Jay Leno Show at 11:35. For 60 years the Tonight Show has aired immediately following the late local news. I sincerely believe that delaying the Tonight Show into the next day to accommodate another comedy program will seriously damage what I consider to be the greatest franchise in the history of broadcasting. The Tonight Show at 12:05 simply isn’t the Tonight Show. Also, if I accept this move I will be knocking the Late Night show, which I inherited from David Letterman and passed on to Jimmy Fallon, out of its long-held time slot. That would hurt the other NBC franchise that I love, and it would be unfair to Jimmy.</p>
<p>So it has come to this: I cannot express in words how much I enjoy hosting this program and what an enormous personal disappointment it is for me to consider losing it. My staff and I have worked unbelievably hard and we are very proud of our contribution to the legacy of The Tonight Show. But I cannot participate in what I honestly believe is its destruction. Some people will make the argument that with DVRs and the Internet a time slot doesn’t matter. But with the Tonight Show, I believe nothing could matter more.</p>
<p>There has been speculation about my going to another network but, to set the record straight, I currently have no other offer and honestly have no idea what happens next. My hope is that NBC and I can resolve this quickly so that my staff, crew, and I can do a show we can be proud of, for a company that values our work.</p>
<p>Have a great day and, for the record, I am truly sorry about my hair; it’s always been that way.</p>
<p>Yours,</p>
<p>Conan</p></blockquote>
<span class="sfforumlink"><a href="http://behindthescreensblog.com/forums/articles/conan-to-nbc-pluck-you/"><img src="http://behindthescreensblog.com/wp-content/plugins/simple-forum/styles/icons/default/bloglink.png" alt="" /> Join the forum discussion on this post</a> - (1) Posts</span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://behindthescreensblog.com/2010/01/12/conan-to-nbc-pluck-you/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Heat Wave&#8221; sequel coming in September; Season 3 of Castle imminent?</title>
		<link>http://behindthescreensblog.com/2010/01/12/heat-wave-sequel-coming-in-september-season-3-of-castle-imminent/</link>
		<comments>http://behindthescreensblog.com/2010/01/12/heat-wave-sequel-coming-in-september-season-3-of-castle-imminent/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 19:20:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric S</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ABC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CASTLE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric S]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://behindthescreensblog.com/?p=860</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ABC did not announce an early renewal for &#8220;Castle&#8221; as it did for &#8220;The Middle,&#8221; &#8220;Modern Family,&#8221; and &#8220;Cougar Town,&#8221; but it did something almost as good: It announced a sequel to the hit novel &#8220;Heat Wave&#8221; by Richard Castle.  The second book by Richard Castle will be released in September, leading one to believe [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ABC did not announce an early renewal for &#8220;Castle&#8221; as it did for &#8220;The Middle,&#8221; &#8220;Modern Family,&#8221; and &#8220;Cougar Town,&#8221; but it did something almost as good: It announced a sequel to the hit novel &#8220;Heat Wave&#8221; by Richard Castle.  The second book by Richard Castle will be released in September, leading one to believe a third season of the fun detective drama is looking like  a pretty solid possibility.  Here&#8217;s the ABC press release:</p>
<p><span id="more-860"></span></p>
<p>SECOND BOOK FROM RICHARD CASTLE &#8211; STAR OF ABC&#8217;S &#8220;CASTLE&#8221; -<br />
PLANNED FOR RELEASE SEPTEMBER 2010</p>
<p>HEAT WAVE by Richard Castle, star of the hit ABC series &#8220;Castle&#8221; (Mondays, 10:00-11:00 p.m., ET), has been a successful cross-platform collaboration between ABC and Hyperion. Published at the end of September 2009, HEAT WAVE has spent 14 weeks on the New York Times Hardcover bestsellers list, currently holding the #32 position for Sunday, January 17, 2010. Hyperion has gone back to press eight times and now has over 170,000 copies in print. With this great success, a second book from Richard Castle will be published at the end of September 2010.</p>
<p>HEAT WAVE is Hyperion&#8217;s #2 bestselling ebook for 2009, surpassed only by &#8220;The Last Lecture.&#8221; It is also Hyperion&#8217;s #5 Kindle bestseller for the year. The free chapters of HEAT WAVE offered on ABC.com have been downloaded almost 100,000 times since the first chapter posted in August 2009. HEAT WAVE will be released as a mass market paperback edition in August 2010.</p>
<p>UNTITLED CASTLE BOOK 2 by Richard Castle &#8211;<br />
In the sequel to HEAT WAVE, Castle&#8217;s new thrilling mystery continues the story of NYPD Homicide Detective Nikki Heat. Tough, sexy, professional, Nikki Heat carries a passion for justice as she leads one of New York City&#8217;s top homicide squads. In what&#8217;s sure to be another smash sensation by this blockbuster author, readers will once again follow Nikki Heat and hotshot reporter Jameson Rook as they trade barbs and innuendos, all while on the trail of a murderer!</p>
<p>For more information on &#8220;Castle,&#8221; visit ABC.com</p>
<span class="sfforumlink"><a href="http://behindthescreensblog.com/forums/articles/heat-wave-sequel-coming-in-september-season-3-of-castle-imminent/"><img src="http://behindthescreensblog.com/wp-content/plugins/simple-forum/styles/icons/default/bloglink.png" alt="" /> Join the forum discussion on this post</a> - (1) Posts</span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://behindthescreensblog.com/2010/01/12/heat-wave-sequel-coming-in-september-season-3-of-castle-imminent/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
